 |
|
Party is a state of mind
|
|
Congratulations, Mr Obama.
Rex and I, amongst many others, watched the inauguration. When the oath was complete we cracked a bottle of cheap, pink champagne (Rex's favourite) and toasted that Mr Bush could no longer do any damage. And while we celebrated we also acknowledged that, without hesitation, Mr Obama began to put the wheels in motion to undo all of the damage that Mr Bush, in his most inept idiom, had done to the planet over the last eight years.
Naturally, as any celebration dictates, participants began to dissipate. Eventually there was just Rex and I. But the music flowed and the muse continued and beverage was consumed. When there was simply one, there was no change. Music, dialogue, beverage. There was still a party.
Party is a state of mind. If there is sufficient cause for celebration (like, for example, having an incompetent world leader, such as King Louis XVI of France or Czar Nicholas II of Russia or Idi Amin of Uganda or George W. Bush, removed from power) then is there really a limit to the number of participants for the event to be classified a "party"?
Just you and the statue. Drink and dance and sing and converse. It's an event worthy of celebration. Party on. Party is a state of mind. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|